Document & Claim Verification
A document makes a claim. It does not settle it.
BSOCIETY investigates what a document actually supports: its attributed source, the authority behind it, its place in the chronology and its consistency with independently accessible evidence.
Meet with an expertMetadata is one analytical input. It is not proof of authenticity or falsity.
Read the material in its commercial context.
Depending on the mandate, the review may cover corporate documents, authorization letters, seller mandates, SCO, FCO, LOI, ICPO, NCNDA, IMFPA, SPA, certificates, proof-of-product materials and banking instructions.
A document title does not determine legal effect or establish performance. We isolate each material assertion and the evidence needed to support it. Contract interpretation remains a matter for counsel.
Issuer, signatory and provenance.
Names, company numbers, addresses, domains and signatories are compared with suitable independent sources. We distinguish a document attributed to a company from evidence that the company issued it and that the signatory had the relevant authority.
Where appropriate and authorized, issuer confirmation can be pursued using independently established contact details. Limits on disclosure, confidentiality and response are reported rather than filled with assumptions.
Compare across documents and time.
Dates, revision history, quantities, participant roles, beneficiary details and the document sequence can reveal inconsistencies that a single-document review misses. A change may be legitimate, but its explanation should be tested.
File metadata can reflect scanning, conversion, templates or subsequent handling. We interpret it alongside provenance, content and other evidence; we do not present a software timestamp as a forensic verdict.
State what remains unverified.
A coherent document set cannot establish physical stock, product quality, control of a shipment or bank-account ownership without the appropriate evidence. A genuine certificate may also concern a different facility, date, product or transaction.
The report separates observations, corroborated facts, unexplained differences and unresolved claims. Specialist forensic examination, official authentication, technical inspection or legal analysis may need a separate mandate.
Before you take exposure, understand what can be verified.
A confidential conversation about the questions, the scope and the next step.